PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHF vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHF vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHF achieves a 54.07% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 98.48% return.


FTHF

1D
0.65%
1M
17.56%
YTD
54.07%
6M
64.60%
1Y
113.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
1.31%
1M
-3.87%
YTD
98.48%
6M
95.54%
1Y
97.37%
3Y*
28.86%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHF vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
54.07%65.30%-8.14%18.14%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
98.48%-8.46%13.35%-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHF and USO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

-0.03

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FTHF and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHF vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHF
FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHF vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHFUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.50

2.22

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

2.81

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.37

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.11

5.12

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.04

9.66

+10.38

FTHF vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHF Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is higher than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHF and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHFUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.50

2.22

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

-0.18

+2.09

Drawdowns

FTHF vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHF drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHF and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHFUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-98.19%

+80.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-20.39%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-85.39%

+85.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-75.30%

+71.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

10.81%

-5.02%

Volatility

FTHF vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is 11.87%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 15.03%. This indicates that FTHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHFUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.87%

15.03%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.37%

38.18%

-13.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.70%

44.26%

-11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.44%

36.04%

-10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.44%

39.00%

-13.56%

FTHF vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHF vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

FTHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
2.93%4.40%3.34%0.51%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHF and USO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USO has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to FTHF (11.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHF dropped -17.36% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 113.71% vs 97.37% for USO. On fees, FTHF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FTHF has been the lower-risk option at 11.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 113.71% return vs 97.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTHF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

FTHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

FTHF is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while USO is Oil & Gas. FTHF tracks Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTHF and 0.86% for USO.

FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHF and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer