PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHF vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHF vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHF achieves a 51.24% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 8.99% return.


FTHF

1D
-1.84%
1M
15.16%
YTD
51.24%
6M
61.52%
1Y
109.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UEVM

1D
-1.86%
1M
0.77%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.31%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
18.34%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHF vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
51.24%65.30%-8.14%18.14%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
8.99%22.74%11.92%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHF and UEVM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.76

The correlation between FTHF and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTHF vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTHF
UEVM

Technology

40.7%
15.5%

Financial Services

27.7%
17.7%

Basic Materials

10.3%
4.6%

Energy

7.2%
5.2%

Industrials

6.2%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
5.5%

Utilities

2.5%
4.1%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

0.5%
4.4%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

FTHF
40.7%
UEVM
15.5%

Financial Services

FTHF
27.7%
UEVM
17.7%

Basic Materials

FTHF
10.3%
UEVM
4.6%

Energy

FTHF
7.2%
UEVM
5.2%

Industrials

FTHF
6.2%
UEVM
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

FTHF
3.4%
UEVM
5.5%

Utilities

FTHF
2.5%
UEVM
4.1%

Communication Services

FTHF
1.0%
UEVM
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTHF
0.6%
UEVM
5.0%

Healthcare

FTHF
0.5%
UEVM
4.4%

Real Estate

FTHF

-

UEVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHF vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHF
FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHF vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHFUEVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.36

1.65

+1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

2.26

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.30

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.74

2.56

+4.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.95

8.65

+10.30

FTHF vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHF Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHF and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHFUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36

1.65

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.86

0.33

+1.54

Drawdowns

FTHF vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHF drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHF and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHFUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-45.44%

+28.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.31%

-9.79%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-2.18%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-11.67%

+7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

2.89%

+2.90%

Volatility

FTHF vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.15%. This indicates that FTHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHFUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.15%

5.15%

+7.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.47%

12.13%

+12.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.76%

15.18%

+17.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

15.90%

+9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.45%

18.39%

+7.06%

FTHF vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHF vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

FTHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than UEVM's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTHF
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF
2.98%4.40%3.34%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.05%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHF and UEVM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTHF has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to UEVM (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTHF dropped -17.36% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 1-year performance, FTHF leads with 109.33% vs 24.92% for UEVM. On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTHF has performed better with a 109.33% return vs 24.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FTHF.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 2.98% for FTHF.

FTHF is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UEVM is Momentum. FTHF tracks Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index, while UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FTHF and 0.45% for UEVM.

FTHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHF and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer