FTHF vs. EMM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM).

FTHF and EMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTHF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Emerging Markets Human Flourishing Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2023. EMM is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Sep 24, 2010.

Performance

FTHF vs. EMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FTHF vs. EMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	15.23%	65.30%	-8.14%	18.14%
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	4.64%	30.21%	2.34%	12.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHF achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than EMM's 4.64% return.

FTHF

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 15.23%
• 6M: 31.41%
• 1Y: 76.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMM

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -8.16%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 6M: 13.44%
• 1Y: 42.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHF vs. EMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FTHF and EMM have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

FTHF

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Return for Risk

FTHF vs. EMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHF

FTHF Risk / Return Rank: 94
FTHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FTHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FTHF Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FTHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTHF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

EMM

EMM Risk / Return Rank: 90
EMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EMM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EMM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHF vs. EMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTHF	EMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.15	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.77	+0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.40	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	2.92	+1.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.66	12.66	+1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTHF vs. EMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the EMM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHF and EMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTHF	EMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.15	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	0.77	+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FTHF and EMM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FTHF vs. EMM - Dividend Comparison

FTHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than EMM's 0.86% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTHF First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF	3.91%	4.40%	3.34%	0.51%
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	0.86%	0.90%	0.80%	0.66%

Drawdowns

FTHF vs. EMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHF drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum EMM drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHF and EMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTHF	EMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.36%	-21.99%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.31%	-14.75%	-1.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.62%	-10.25%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-4.83%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.69%	3.40%	+2.29%

Volatility

FTHF vs. EMM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) at 9.84%. This indicates that FTHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTHF	EMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.67%	9.84%	+3.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.74%	15.79%	+4.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.47%	19.64%	+11.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.24%	17.69%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.24%	17.69%	+6.55%