FTHB vs. BIV
FTHB (FIS Faith Income ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. FTHB is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTHB charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.
Performance
FTHB vs. BIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTHB
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BIV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -0.76%
- 1Y
- 2.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- -0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.77%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $153.07M | $137.01M | $126.46M | |
| $344.24K | $199.21K | $103.78K |
FTHB vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF | 1.66% |
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | -0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTHB and BIV is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTHB vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank
FTHB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BIV
FTHB vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Faith Income ETF (FTHB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTHB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.12 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTHB vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTHB drawdown since its inception was -1.36%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHB and BIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTHB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -18.95% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -2.55% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -3.38% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.28% | — |
Volatility
FTHB vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTHB | BIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.14% | 4.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 6.41% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.14% | 5.50% | -1.36% |
FTHB vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTHB has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTHB vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison
FTHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BIV's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF | 4.28% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.09% | 2.41% | 3.42% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.01% | 3.02% |
FTHB FIS Faith Income ETF | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FTHB and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FTHB.
BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 1.01% for FTHB.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FTHB and 0.03% for BIV.
Find the right allocation for FTHB and BIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer