PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGSX vs. GUSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Total Return Government Bd Fd (FTGSX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGSX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GUSTX's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FTGSX has outperformed GUSTX with an annualized return of 0.52%, while GUSTX has yielded a comparatively lower -13.74% annualized return.


FTGSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.07%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
2.37%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*
0.52%

GUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
-13.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGSX
Federated Hermes Total Return Government Bd Fd
-0.24%6.58%-0.37%2.92%-13.06%-3.22%7.85%6.07%0.73%2.15%
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
1.46%4.45%2.21%2.52%-0.73%-0.06%0.89%0.14%-79.59%0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGSX and GUSTX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.09

The correlation between FTGSX and GUSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (5 years) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGSX vs. GUSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGSX
FTGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FTGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSTX
GUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Government Bd Fd (FTGSX) and GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGSXGUSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

7.41

-6.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

20.36

-18.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

57.94

-53.27

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the GUSTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGSX and GUSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGSXGUSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

3.34

-2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

1.14

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

-0.54

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

-0.44

+1.15

Drawdowns

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGSX drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, smaller than the maximum GUSTX drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGSX and GUSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGSXGUSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.36%

-79.98%

+58.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-0.20%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.79%

-1.19%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-1.19%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.36%

-79.98%

+58.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.66%

-77.68%

+68.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-36.04%

+32.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.07%

+0.89%

Volatility

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Total Return Government Bd Fd (FTGSX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) at 0.34%. This indicates that FTGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGSXGUSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

0.34%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

0.87%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

1.22%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.94%

1.75%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

25.45%

-20.45%

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGSX vs. GUSTX - Dividend Comparison

FTGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than GUSTX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTGSX
Federated Hermes Total Return Government Bd Fd
3.89%3.89%3.38%2.75%1.54%0.92%1.39%2.17%1.92%2.04%2.11%2.71%
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
3.82%4.15%1.98%2.28%0.26%0.14%0.09%0.14%8.96%0.50%0.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGSX and GUSTX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGSX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to GUSTX (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGSX dropped -21.36% vs GUSTX's -79.98%.

GUSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGSX and GUSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer