PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGRX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGRX achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FTGRX has outperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 15.95%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.09% annualized return.


FTGRX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.36%
YTD
10.26%
6M
12.12%
1Y
30.68%
3Y*
24.92%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
15.95%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
10.26%26.22%25.36%25.83%-9.51%25.63%12.30%30.47%-7.95%17.25%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGRX and FSKAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.94

The correlation between FTGRX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGRX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGRX
FTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTGRXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.38

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.82

15.52

+0.30

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGRX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTGRXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.46

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.76

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.82

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.85

-0.28

Drawdowns

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGRX drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGRX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGRXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-35.01%

-17.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-8.92%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-19.43%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-25.39%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

-35.01%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-4.02%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.94%

+0.05%

Volatility

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) is 2.70%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that FTGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGRXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.97%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

9.23%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

12.26%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

17.41%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

18.46%

-0.33%

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGRX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
3.12%3.44%2.20%1.60%3.88%4.34%7.59%12.62%21.28%15.95%1.52%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FTGRX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FTGRX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGRX dropped -52.75% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGRX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer