PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGRX vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGRX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.


FTGRX

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.46%
1Y
27.32%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
16.30%

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
8.99%26.22%25.36%25.83%-9.51%25.63%12.30%17.06%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGRX and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.92

The correlation between FTGRX and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGRX vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGRX
FTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGRXBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.49

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

10.97

+2.96

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGRX and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGRX drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGRX and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGRXBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-35.35%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-9.21%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-19.01%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-25.46%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-3.47%

+2.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-5.43%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.08%

-0.04%

Volatility

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) is 4.33%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FTGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGRXBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

5.00%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

9.95%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

12.59%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

17.14%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

19.59%

-1.42%

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGRX vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

FTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
3.16%3.44%2.20%1.60%3.88%4.34%7.59%12.62%21.28%15.95%1.52%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FTGRX and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FTGRX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGRX dropped -52.75% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

FTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGRX and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer