PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGRX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGRX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 9.06% return.


FTGRX

1D
2.11%
1M
0.15%
6M
7.11%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
15.79%
10Y*
15.63%
ALL TIME*
11.50%

FNILX

1D
1.68%
1M
-0.67%
6M
7.78%
YTD
9.06%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
10.36%26.22%25.36%25.83%-9.51%25.63%12.30%30.47%-14.64%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.06%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGRX and FNILX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.92

The correlation between FTGRX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGRX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTGRX
FTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGRXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.98

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

8.30

+1.50

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGRX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGRX drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGRX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGRXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-33.76%

-18.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-9.01%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.54%

-19.08%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-25.40%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.24%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.74%

-5.30%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.14%

-0.04%

Volatility

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M (FTGRX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGRXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.46%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

10.17%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

12.97%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

17.37%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

19.95%

-1.86%

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTGRX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FNILX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTGRX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class M
3.12%3.44%2.20%1.60%3.88%4.34%7.59%12.62%21.28%15.95%1.52%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FTGRX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTGRX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FNILX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGRX dropped -52.75% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGRX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer