FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE
FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) and HNDX.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. FTGQ.DE is actively managed, while HNDX.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, FTGQ.DE returned 16.00% vs 25.29% for HNDX.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTGQ.DE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HNDX.DE.
Performance
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than HNDX.DE's 13.90% return.
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HNDX.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- 6M
- 14.81%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 9.27% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
HNDX.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 13.90% | 17.83% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and HNDX.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGQ.DE
HNDX.DE
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTGQ.DE | HNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 2.08 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.58 | 6.75 | +4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum HNDX.DE drawdown of -37.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and HNDX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGQ.DE | HNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.13% | -37.18% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -12.13% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -4.15% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -5.90% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 3.74% | -2.35% |
Volatility
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.96%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (HNDX.DE) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNDX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGQ.DE | HNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 6.43% | -4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 15.60% | -10.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.79% | 19.20% | -10.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 21.42% | -9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 20.23% | -7.86% |
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HNDX.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGQ.DE vs. HNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGQ.DE nor HNDX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGQ.DE and HNDX.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HNDX.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HNDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.35% for HNDX.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGQ.DE and HNDX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer