FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) and EQQQ.DE (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. FTGQ.DE is actively managed, while EQQQ.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, FTGQ.DE returned 16.10% vs 37.03% for EQQQ.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGQ.DE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.DE.

Performance

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.DE's 20.52% return.

FTGQ.DE

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 7.60%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 16.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.99%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 37.03%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 21.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation	7.60%	1.05%	-3.86%
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	20.52%	6.94%	-1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024	0.76

The correlation between FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGQ.DE

FTGQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
FTGQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FTGQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FTGQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FTGQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FTGQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

EQQQ.DE

EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTGQ.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	2.40	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.19	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.42	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.23	3.74	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.47	11.10	+0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTGQ.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	2.40	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.80	-0.56

Drawdowns

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGQ.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.13%	-47.04%	+27.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.80%	-10.05%	+6.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.85%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-7.35%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	3.39%	-1.98%

Volatility

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.30%, while Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTGQ.DE	EQQQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	4.26%	-2.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	10.90%	-5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.64%	15.64%	-7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.69%	19.84%	-7.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	19.65%	-6.96%

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTGQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

FTGQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.37%	0.39%	0.57%	0.25%	0.41%	0.54%	0.64%	0.68%	0.78%	0.73%
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE in my portfolio?

FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTGQ.DE or EQQQ.DE?

On fees, EQQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTGQ.DE or EQQQ.DE?

EQQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.

What is the main difference between FTGQ.DE and EQQQ.DE?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.