FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE
FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) and ANAU.DE (AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. FTGQ.DE is actively managed, while ANAU.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, FTGQ.DE returned 16.15% vs 38.19% for ANAU.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTGQ.DE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for ANAU.DE.
Performance
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTGQ.DE is traded in EUR, while ANAU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ANAU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGQ.DE achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than ANAU.DE's 20.62% return.
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 20.62%
- 6M
- 19.50%
- 1Y
- 38.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 20.63% | 6.81% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and ANAU.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FTGQ.DE and ANAU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FTGQ.DE
ANAU.DE
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGQ.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 3.74 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 11.11 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGQ.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.31 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.38 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.13%, smaller than the maximum ANAU.DE drawdown of -26.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGQ.DE and ANAU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGQ.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.13% | -26.00% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.80% | -10.15% | +6.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.83% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.30% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 3.43% | -2.02% |
Volatility
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) is 1.30%, while AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that FTGQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTGQ.DE | ANAU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 4.56% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.09% | 11.85% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 16.48% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 19.09% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 19.09% | -6.40% |
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTGQ.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTGQ.DE nor ANAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTGQ.DE and ANAU.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AXA IM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FTGQ.DE and 0.14% for ANAU.DE.
Find the right allocation for FTGQ.DE and ANAU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer