PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTGC vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTGC vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 23.17% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 58.13% return.


FTGC

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.98%
6M
21.09%
YTD
23.17%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
7.29%

TRMD

1D
5.06%
1M
1.83%
6M
37.79%
YTD
58.13%
1Y
77.92%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
44.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
23.17%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%27.95%2.17%6.40%-13.54%
TRMD
TORM plc
58.13%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%12.91%-25.94%84.18%-22.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and TRMD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTGC vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTGCTRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

3.50

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.04

9.19

-0.15

FTGC vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and TRMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, roughly equal to the maximum TRMD drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and TRMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTGCTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-60.59%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.34%

-23.53%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-60.59%

+48.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-60.59%

+37.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-13.49%

+5.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-22.50%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

8.96%

-5.32%

Volatility

FTGC vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 4.13%, while TORM plc (TRMD) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTGCTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

13.04%

-8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

29.13%

-15.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

38.27%

-22.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

46.26%

-30.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

59.70%

-44.99%

Dividends

FTGC vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.73%, more than TRMD's 8.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
15.73%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
TRMD
TORM plc
8.21%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTGC and TRMD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMD has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to FTGC (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs TRMD's -60.59%.

TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTGC and TRMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer