FTGC vs. COMB
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB).
FTGC and COMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTGC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Oct 23, 2013. COMB is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on May 22, 2017.
Performance
FTGC vs. COMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTGC vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 25.41% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -12.75% | 4.05% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 24.42% | 15.12% | 5.24% | -7.75% | 14.56% | 26.34% | -2.95% | 7.02% | -11.41% | 4.98% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTGC having a 25.41% return and COMB slightly lower at 24.42%.
FTGC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 25.41%
- 6M
- 30.43%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
COMB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 11.58%
- YTD
- 24.42%
- 6M
- 31.07%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTGC vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTGC vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank
FTGC
COMB
FTGC vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.85 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 2.44 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.57 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 9.81 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.85 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.82 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGC and COMB is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTGC vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison
FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than COMB's 7.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.29% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF | 7.27% | 9.05% | 2.48% | 6.57% | 30.85% | 15.83% | 0.07% | 1.48% | 0.97% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
FTGC vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than COMB's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and COMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -33.50% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -9.19% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -26.63% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -12.25% | -15.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.34% | -0.09% |
Volatility
FTGC vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 6.58%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 7.51%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTGC | COMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 7.51% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 13.80% | -0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 17.18% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 16.53% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 15.05% | -0.36% |