FTGC vs. COM
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM).
FTGC and COM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FTGC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Oct 23, 2013. COM is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Performance
FTGC vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTGC vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 25.41% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -12.75% | 3.59% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 14.18% | 7.72% | 5.81% | -2.09% | 9.17% | 28.00% | 6.63% | -0.18% | -0.03% | -2.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 25.41% return, which is significantly higher than COM's 14.18% return.
FTGC
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 25.41%
- 6M
- 30.43%
- 1Y
- 34.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
COM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 6M
- 18.01%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTGC vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTGC vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
FTGC
COM
FTGC vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTGC | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.72 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 2.24 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.96 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 6.37 | +4.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTGC | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.72 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 1.05 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.73 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTGC and COM is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FTGC vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.29%, more than COM's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.29% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.48% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
Drawdowns
FTGC vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, which is greater than COM's maximum drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and COM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTGC | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.47% | -15.95% | -43.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.36% | -6.15% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -14.02% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.64% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -6.38% | -21.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.86% | +0.39% |
Volatility
FTGC vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM) at 3.77%. This indicates that FTGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTGC | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 3.77% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 8.21% | +4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 10.35% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 9.71% | +6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 9.76% | +4.93% |