FTGC vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both Commodities funds. FTGC is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTGC returned 14.26%/yr vs 123.86%/yr for BWET. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTGC charges 0.95%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

FTGC vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTGC achieves a 18.86% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 968.33% return.

FTGC

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: 18.86%
• 6M: 17.54%
• 1Y: 28.18%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

BWET

• 1D: -5.48%
• 1M: 18.43%
• YTD: 968.33%
• 6M: 944.72%
• 1Y: 1,424.52%
• 3Y*: 123.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTGC vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	18.86%	14.61%	9.96%	1.56%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	968.33%	96.22%	-39.21%	14.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FTGC and BWET is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.03

Return for Risk

FTGC vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 55
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 98
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTGC vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTGC	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	14.65	-12.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	6.07	-3.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.87	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	47.03	-44.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.67	147.28	-137.61

FTGC vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTGC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTGC and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTGC vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTGC drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, roughly equal to the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTGC and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTGC	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.47%	-56.90%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-30.64%	+19.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.87%	-56.81%	+45.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.87%	-5.48%	-5.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.34%	-23.76%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	11.60%	-8.66%

Volatility

FTGC vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is 3.07%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 26.27%. This indicates that FTGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTGC	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	26.27%	-23.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	89.01%	-75.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	98.57%	-82.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.87%	70.47%	-54.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.71%	70.47%	-55.76%

FTGC vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTGC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTGC vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.13%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	16.13%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTGC and BWET in my portfolio?

FTGC and BWET have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTGC or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (26.27%) compared to FTGC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTGC dropped -59.47% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, FTGC or BWET?

On 3-year performance, BWET leads with 123.86% vs 14.26% for FTGC. On fees, FTGC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTGC or BWET?

Over the 3-year period, BWET has performed better with a 123.86% return vs 14.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTGC or BWET?

FTGC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTGC or BWET?

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between FTGC and BWET?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FTGC and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.