PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTEU.L is traded in USD, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FTEU.L having a 12.33% return and IEDL.L slightly higher at 12.73%.


FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
2.06%
YTD
12.33%
6M
16.13%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

IEDL.L

1D
0.03%
1M
3.90%
YTD
12.73%
6M
16.66%
1Y
35.02%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.33%57.74%2.77%16.49%-18.83%11.78%5.07%20.55%-20.94%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
12.73%53.13%3.63%17.09%-9.53%18.08%-0.69%19.41%-17.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEU.L and IEDL.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.89

The correlation between FTEU.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEU.L
IEDL.L

Industrials

27.4%
17.0%

Energy

10.8%
5.1%

Financial Services

10.6%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
6.2%

Utilities

8.3%
4.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.6%

Technology

6.0%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
8.6%

Healthcare

5.2%
12.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.7%

Industrials

FTEU.L
27.4%
IEDL.L
17.0%

Energy

FTEU.L
10.8%
IEDL.L
5.1%

Financial Services

FTEU.L
10.6%
IEDL.L
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEU.L
9.2%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Utilities

FTEU.L
8.3%
IEDL.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

FTEU.L
7.5%
IEDL.L
6.2%

Real Estate

FTEU.L
6.0%
IEDL.L
0.6%

Technology

FTEU.L
6.0%
IEDL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

FTEU.L
5.3%
IEDL.L
8.6%

Healthcare

FTEU.L
5.2%
IEDL.L
12.3%

Communication Services

FTEU.L
3.7%
IEDL.L
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IEDL.L
IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTEU.LIEDL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.40

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.02

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

10.80

-0.72

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEU.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTEU.LIEDL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.23

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.72

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.49

+0.05

Drawdowns

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEU.L drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, which is greater than IEDL.L's maximum drawdown of -43.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEU.L and IEDL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTEU.LIEDL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-43.17%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-11.53%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-17.39%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-31.20%

-7.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.86%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-8.50%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.23%

+0.01%

Volatility

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) have volatilities of 5.53% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTEU.LIEDL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

5.40%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

12.50%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

15.64%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

18.58%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

20.11%

-0.25%

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEU.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEU.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

FTEU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEDL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
3.01%3.44%4.22%4.76%4.23%3.56%2.32%3.86%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEU.L and IEDL.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEDL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEDL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FTEU.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEU.L and IEDL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer