PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTEU.L is traded in USD, while BLOK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BLOK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTEU.L having a 12.33% return and BLOK.L slightly lower at 12.20%.


FTEU.L

1D
0.25%
1M
2.06%
YTD
12.33%
6M
16.13%
1Y
32.73%
3Y*
25.79%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

BLOK.L

1D
0.23%
1M
6.39%
YTD
12.20%
6M
15.96%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTEU.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.33%57.74%2.77%16.49%-18.83%11.78%5.07%20.55%-22.01%
BLOK.L
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF
12.20%31.58%16.58%20.82%-18.71%18.00%18.57%27.51%-10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEU.L and BLOK.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FTEU.L and BLOK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEU.L
BLOK.L

Industrials

27.4%
5.6%

Energy

10.8%
0.7%

Financial Services

10.6%
40.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.4%

Utilities

8.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

7.5%
1.6%

Real Estate

6.0%

-

Technology

6.0%
31.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
1.3%

Healthcare

5.2%
0.8%

Communication Services

3.7%
8.3%

Industrials

FTEU.L
27.4%
BLOK.L
5.6%

Energy

FTEU.L
10.8%
BLOK.L
0.7%

Financial Services

FTEU.L
10.6%
BLOK.L
40.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEU.L
9.2%
BLOK.L
8.4%

Utilities

FTEU.L
8.3%
BLOK.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

FTEU.L
7.5%
BLOK.L
1.6%

Real Estate

FTEU.L
6.0%
BLOK.L

-

Technology

FTEU.L
6.0%
BLOK.L
31.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTEU.L
5.3%
BLOK.L
1.3%

Healthcare

FTEU.L
5.2%
BLOK.L
0.8%

Communication Services

FTEU.L
3.7%
BLOK.L
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEU.L
FTEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK.L
BLOK.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTEU.LBLOK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.10

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

11.68

-1.60

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the BLOK.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEU.L and BLOK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTEU.LBLOK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.24

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.72

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.72

-0.17

Drawdowns

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEU.L drawdown since its inception was -46.61%, which is greater than BLOK.L's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEU.L and BLOK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTEU.LBLOK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.61%

-34.22%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-9.86%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-14.14%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.49%

-32.06%

-6.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-1.43%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-6.57%

-3.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.62%

+0.62%

Volatility

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FTEU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process UCITS ETF (BLOK.L) at 4.96%. This indicates that FTEU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTEU.LBLOK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

4.96%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.10%

10.03%

+4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

13.68%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.22%

16.44%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

18.18%

+1.68%

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEU.L has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BLOK.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEU.L vs. BLOK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTEU.L nor BLOK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEU.L and BLOK.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLOK.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLOK.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FTEU.L.

FTEU.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while BLOK.L is Technology Equities. FTEU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while BLOK.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FTEU.L and 0.65% for BLOK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEU.L and BLOK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer