FTEC vs. SOXQ
FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTEC returned 20.63%/yr vs 34.23%/yr for SOXQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 89.01% return.
FTEC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 48.62%
- 3Y*
- 30.29%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- 24.98%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 11.31%
- YTD
- 89.01%
- 6M
- 90.35%
- 1Y
- 155.88%
- 3Y*
- 54.65%
- 5Y*
- 34.23%
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 24.27% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 21.29% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 89.01% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and SOXQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FTEC and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTEC
SOXQ
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTEC
SOXQ
Communication Services
FTEC
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
FTEC
SOXQ
Industrials
FTEC
SOXQ
-
Energy
FTEC
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTEC
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
FTEC
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
FTEC
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
FTEC
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
FTEC
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
FTEC
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTEC vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
FTEC
SOXQ
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTEC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 10.06 | -7.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 36.55 | -27.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -46.01% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -15.59% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | -39.36% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -46.01% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -3.91% | -3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.57% | -12.92% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 4.29% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is 10.02%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 18.79%. This indicates that FTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTEC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | 18.79% | -8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 30.67% | -12.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 36.79% | -14.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.45% | 36.89% | -11.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 36.87% | -12.06% |
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTEC vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTEC and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (18.79%) compared to FTEC (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 34.23% vs 20.63% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 34.23% return vs 20.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.
FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTEC and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer