PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTEC vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTEC vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 24.27% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 17.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FTEC has outperformed QQQE with an annualized return of 24.98%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.


FTEC

1D
0.61%
1M
3.09%
YTD
24.27%
6M
24.36%
1Y
51.03%
3Y*
30.29%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
24.98%

QQQE

1D
1.18%
1M
5.18%
YTD
17.14%
6M
16.29%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTEC vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
24.27%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
17.14%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FTEC and QQQE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.90

The correlation between FTEC and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTEC vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTEC
QQQE

Technology

98.3%
51.0%

Industrials

0.6%
9.3%

Financial Services

0.5%
0.8%

Energy

0.4%
1.7%

Communication Services

0.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
9.8%

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.0%

Healthcare

-

7.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.4%

Technology

FTEC
98.3%
QQQE
51.0%

Industrials

FTEC
0.6%
QQQE
9.3%

Financial Services

FTEC
0.5%
QQQE
0.8%

Energy

FTEC
0.4%
QQQE
1.7%

Communication Services

FTEC
0.0%
QQQE
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FTEC
0.0%
QQQE
9.8%

Basic Materials

FTEC
0.0%
QQQE
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

FTEC

-

QQQE
7.0%

Healthcare

FTEC

-

QQQE
7.8%

Real Estate

FTEC

-

QQQE
0.7%

Utilities

FTEC

-

QQQE
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTEC vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTEC vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTECQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.65

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

8.95

+0.41

FTEC vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTEC and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTEC vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTECQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-32.14%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.26%

-9.41%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.30%

-21.38%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-32.14%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-32.14%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-1.76%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-5.16%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

2.79%

+2.42%

Volatility

FTEC vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 7.04%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTECQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

7.04%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.06%

12.12%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

15.28%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.45%

20.45%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

20.79%

+4.02%

FTEC vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTEC vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QQQE's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.34%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.53%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTEC and QQQE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTEC has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to QQQE (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 24.98% vs 15.61% for QQQE. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 24.98% return vs 15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.34% for FTEC.

FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.35% for QQQE.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTEC and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer