FTEC vs. CHPS
FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTEC returned 60.87% vs 223.67% for CHPS. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
FTEC vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 31.89% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.97% return.
FTEC
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 31.89%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 60.87%
- 3Y*
- 33.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
CHPS
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 32.32%
- YTD
- 107.97%
- 6M
- 109.04%
- 1Y
- 223.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 31.89% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 8.54% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 107.97% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and CHPS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FTEC and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTEC vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTEC
CHPS
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTEC
CHPS
Industrials
FTEC
CHPS
Financial Services
FTEC
CHPS
Energy
FTEC
CHPS
Communication Services
FTEC
CHPS
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTEC
CHPS
-
Basic Materials
FTEC
-
CHPS
-
Consumer Defensive
FTEC
-
CHPS
-
Healthcare
FTEC
-
CHPS
-
Real Estate
FTEC
-
CHPS
-
Utilities
FTEC
-
CHPS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTEC vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
FTEC
CHPS
FTEC vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTEC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.81 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 12.87 | -9.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.10 | 49.99 | -37.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTEC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 6.54 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.81 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -39.44% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -17.50% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | 0.00% | -1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -9.16% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 4.50% | +0.55% |
Volatility
FTEC vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is 6.43%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 14.18%. This indicates that FTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTEC | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 14.18% | -7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.14% | 28.19% | -12.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 34.43% | -13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.23% | 33.78% | -8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 33.78% | -9.09% |
FTEC vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTEC vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, which matches CHPS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTEC and CHPS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to FTEC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 223.67% vs 60.87% for FTEC. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 223.67% return vs 60.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.
FTEC and CHPS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.32%.
FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTEC and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer