PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVSX vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVSX achieves a 23.99% return, which is significantly higher than VOOG's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FCVSX has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 12.79%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.


FCVSX

1D
1.21%
1M
3.09%
YTD
23.99%
6M
11.57%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*
12.79%

VOOG

1D
-0.76%
1M
0.32%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.95%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
14.71%
10Y*
18.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
23.99%8.52%13.91%11.42%-15.33%9.95%42.52%28.58%-1.29%9.03%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
11.32%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVSX and VOOG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.82

The correlation between FCVSX and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVSX vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVSX
FCVSX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVSXVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

2.31

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.60

9.24

-0.64

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVSX and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVSX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVSX and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVSXVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-32.73%

-26.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-13.71%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.56%

-22.18%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-32.73%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.08%

-32.73%

+7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-3.22%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-4.96%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

3.43%

+0.09%

Volatility

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund (FCVSX) is 6.47%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FCVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVSXVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

6.83%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

13.68%

+2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

16.89%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

21.35%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.97%

20.82%

-6.85%

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVSX vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

FCVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VOOG's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVSX
Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund
1.48%2.21%7.47%2.13%3.78%20.64%10.75%3.28%9.86%4.11%4.90%10.41%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.45%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVSX and VOOG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to FCVSX (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVSX dropped -58.76% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVSX and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer