PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCHX vs. MSIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCHX achieves a 39.42% return, which is significantly higher than MSIGX's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FTCHX has outperformed MSIGX with an annualized return of 20.93%, while MSIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.91% annualized return.


FTCHX

1D
-5.62%
1M
2.28%
YTD
39.42%
6M
35.73%
1Y
61.82%
3Y*
36.93%
5Y*
15.36%
10Y*
20.93%

MSIGX

1D
-1.37%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
3.87%
6M
2.75%
1Y
14.66%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTCHX
Invesco Technology Fund
39.42%20.77%34.49%47.38%-39.96%13.00%46.14%35.62%-0.88%34.78%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
3.87%16.02%23.66%23.06%-20.21%27.37%14.41%22.49%-8.25%16.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCHX and MSIGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 1988

0.81

The correlation between FTCHX and MSIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCHX vs. MSIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCHX
FTCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FTCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

MSIGX
MSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) and Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCHXMSIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

1.65

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

6.65

+9.04

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the MSIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCHX and MSIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCHX drawdown since its inception was -87.78%, which is greater than MSIGX's maximum drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCHX and MSIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCHXMSIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.78%

-57.22%

-30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-10.96%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.38%

-19.91%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.89%

-26.73%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

-35.41%

-12.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-2.64%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-8.98%

-27.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.60%

+1.56%

Volatility

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Technology Fund (FTCHX) has a higher volatility of 15.08% compared to Invesco Main Street Fund (MSIGX) at 4.83%. This indicates that FTCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCHXMSIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.08%

4.83%

+10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.40%

10.14%

+15.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.70%

12.95%

+17.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

17.01%

+12.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.71%

17.92%

+8.79%

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCHX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MSIGX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCHX vs. MSIGX - Dividend Comparison

FTCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.05%, more than MSIGX's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTCHX
Invesco Technology Fund
19.05%26.56%13.59%0.80%1.60%27.66%7.06%9.58%9.01%4.14%6.98%6.88%
MSIGX
Invesco Main Street Fund
7.22%7.50%6.06%7.40%4.68%19.19%3.17%0.89%19.62%7.50%2.96%13.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCHX and MSIGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCHX has higher volatility (15.08%) compared to MSIGX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCHX dropped -87.78% vs MSIGX's -57.22%.

FTCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCHX and MSIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer