FTCE vs. SUPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTCE (First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF) and SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FTCE is passively managed, while SUPP is actively managed. Over the past year, FTCE returned 34.82% vs 32.28% for SUPP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTCE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SUPP.

Performance

FTCE vs. SUPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than SUPP's 21.37% return.

FTCE

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 9.77%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 13.40%
• 1Y: 34.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SUPP

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 6.38%
• YTD: 21.37%
• 6M: 18.97%
• 1Y: 32.28%
• 3Y*: 19.34%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCE vs. SUPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF	13.44%	26.14%	-0.04%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	21.37%	11.65%	-3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCE and SUPP is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.76

The correlation between FTCE and SUPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTCE vs. SUPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTCE	SUPP
Technology	21.8%	37.9%
Industrials	15.8%	51.2%
Financial Services	14.9%	-
Healthcare	10.9%	-
Utilities	7.9%	-
Real Estate	6.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	6.7%
Energy	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.0%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

FTCE vs. SUPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCE

FTCE Risk / Return Rank: 77
FTCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FTCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FTCE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FTCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FTCE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

SUPP

SUPP Risk / Return Rank: 50
SUPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SUPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SUPP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCE vs. SUPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTCE	SUPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.68	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	2.38	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.30	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	2.39	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.21	9.82	+3.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTCE vs. SUPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCE Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the SUPP Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCE and SUPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTCE	SUPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.68	1.68	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.89	+0.55

Drawdowns

FTCE vs. SUPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, smaller than the maximum SUPP drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and SUPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCE	SUPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-25.03%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	-13.59%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-0.15%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-4.41%	+1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	3.29%	-0.65%

Volatility

FTCE vs. SUPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) is 3.63%, while TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that FTCE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTCE	SUPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	7.15%	-3.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	16.42%	-6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.09%	19.38%	-6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	19.44%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	19.44%	-2.68%

FTCE vs. SUPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SUPP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCE vs. SUPP - Dividend Comparison

FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than SUPP's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTCE First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF	0.80%	0.96%	0.28%	0.00%
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF	0.29%	0.35%	0.49%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCE and SUPP in my portfolio?

FTCE and SUPP have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTCE or SUPP?

SUPP has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to FTCE (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs SUPP's -25.03%.

Which ETF is better, FTCE or SUPP?

On 1-year performance, FTCE leads with 34.82% vs 32.28% for SUPP. On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FTCE has been the lower-risk option at 3.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTCE or SUPP?

Over the 1-year period, FTCE has performed better with a 34.82% return vs 32.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTCE or SUPP?

FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTCE or SUPP?

FTCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.29% for SUPP.

What is the main difference between FTCE and SUPP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 0.75% for SUPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.