PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTCE vs. ESN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTCE vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCE achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ESN's 16.65% return.


FTCE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.49%
6M
7.29%
YTD
9.29%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.24%

ESN

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.26%
6M
12.11%
YTD
16.65%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.17M$1.60M$1.63M
$134.84K$169.05K$267.54K

FTCE vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTCE
First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF
9.29%26.14%-2.98%
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
16.65%16.52%-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCE and ESN is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024

0.80

The correlation between FTCE and ESN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTCE vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTCE
FTCE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FTCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTCE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FTCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTCE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ESN
ESN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTCE vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTCEESNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.12

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

16.52

-9.53

FTCE vs. ESN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTCE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the ESN Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTCE and ESN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTCE vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCE drawdown since its inception was -18.11%, which is greater than ESN's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCE and ESN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTCEESNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.11%

-13.60%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.16%

-6.42%

-3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-0.53%

-4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-1.81%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.60%

+1.64%

Volatility

FTCE vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF (FTCE) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN) at 2.65%. This indicates that FTCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTCEESNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.65%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

7.51%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

9.98%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

13.04%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

13.04%

+3.55%

FTCE vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTCE vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

FTCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than ESN's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ESN
Essential 40 Stock ETF
0.78%0.91%0.76%
FTCE
First Trust New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders ETF
0.66%0.96%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTCE and ESN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTCE has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to ESN (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTCE dropped -18.11% vs ESN's -13.60%.

On 1-year performance, ESN leads with 27.64% vs 24.21% for FTCE. On fees, FTCE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, ESN has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESN has performed better with a 27.64% return vs 24.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTCE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.

ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.66% for FTCE.

FTCE tracks Bloomberg New Constructs Core Earnings Leaders Index, while ESN tracks Essential 40 Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KKM. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTCE and 0.70% for ESN.

ESN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTCE and ESN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer