FTCA vs. BSMR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FTCA (Franklin California Municipal Income ETF) and BSMR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. FTCA is actively managed, while BSMR is passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTCA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMR.

Performance

FTCA vs. BSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTCA achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly higher than BSMR's 1.28% return.

FTCA

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.75%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 3.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMR

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.28%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 2.88%
• 5Y*: 0.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTCA vs. BSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF	3.15%	-0.08%
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	1.28%	0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FTCA and BSMR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

FTCA vs. BSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTCA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSMR

BSMR Risk / Return Rank: 94
BSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
BSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTCA vs. BSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California Municipal Income ETF (FTCA) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTCA	BSMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.86	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.75	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.61	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.45	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.26	—

Drawdowns

FTCA vs. BSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTCA drawdown since its inception was -2.92%, smaller than the maximum BSMR drawdown of -13.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTCA and BSMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTCA	BSMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-13.49%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.57%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-3.45%	+2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTCA	BSMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	1.28%	+2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.40%	3.02%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.40%	5.70%	-2.30%

FTCA vs. BSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTCA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMR's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTCA vs. BSMR - Dividend Comparison

FTCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than BSMR's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Municipal Bond ETF	2.71%	2.77%	2.78%	2.72%	1.40%	1.00%	1.49%	0.45%
FTCA Franklin California Municipal Income ETF	2.32%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTCA and BSMR in my portfolio?

FTCA and BSMR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTCA or BSMR?

On fees, BSMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTCA or BSMR?

BSMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTCA or BSMR?

BSMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.32% for FTCA.

What is the main difference between FTCA and BSMR?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTCA and 0.18% for BSMR.