FTBFX vs. FCBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) and FCBFX (Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FTBFX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCBFX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FTBFX returned 2.47%/yr vs 2.77%/yr for FCBFX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTBFX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for FCBFX.

Performance

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBFX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FCBFX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FTBFX has underperformed FCBFX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FCBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.

FTBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

FCBFX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 6.30%
• 3Y*: 5.69%
• 5Y*: 0.52%
• 10Y*: 2.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund	0.65%	7.86%	2.82%	8.82%	-17.11%	-1.59%	10.59%	14.48%	-2.56%	6.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBFX and FCBFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2010	0.94

The correlation between FTBFX and FCBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTBFX vs. FCBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FCBFX

FCBFX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FCBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FCBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FCBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FCBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FCBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTBFX	FCBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.49	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.20	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	1.94	+0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	6.31	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the FCBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBFX and FCBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTBFX	FCBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.49	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.08	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.47	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.71	+0.21

Drawdowns

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum FCBFX drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBFX and FCBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTBFX	FCBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.25%	-23.23%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.89%	-3.31%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.82%	-6.57%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.25%	-23.21%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.25%	-23.23%	+4.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.94%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-3.98%	+1.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.02%	-0.08%

Volatility

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTBFX	FCBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	1.46%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	3.14%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	4.31%	-0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.67%	6.69%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.73%	5.95%	-1.22%

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBFX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTBFX vs. FCBFX - Dividend Comparison

FTBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than FCBFX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund	4.23%	4.11%	3.95%	3.74%	2.53%	2.82%	3.19%	3.28%	3.65%	3.16%	3.55%	3.01%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTBFX and FCBFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FTBFX and FCBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FTBFX or FCBFX?

FCBFX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to FTBFX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBFX dropped -18.25% vs FCBFX's -23.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.