PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBFX vs. FSCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBFX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than FSCSX's -9.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBFX has underperformed FSCSX with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.29% annualized return.


FCBFX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.77%
6M
-0.32%
YTD
-0.13%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
2.47%

FSCSX

1D
0.05%
1M
3.91%
6M
-3.54%
YTD
-9.89%
1Y
-9.71%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
16.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBFX
Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund
-0.13%7.86%2.82%8.82%-17.11%-1.59%10.59%14.48%-2.56%6.83%
FSCSX
Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio
-9.89%6.96%19.66%51.72%-29.13%18.13%45.55%38.99%4.08%38.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBFX and FSCSX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

-0.06

The correlation between FCBFX and FSCSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBFX vs. FSCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBFX
FCBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FCBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCSX
FSCSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FSCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) and Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBFXFSCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.97

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.27

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

-0.57

+4.74

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the FSCSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBFX and FSCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBFX drawdown since its inception was -23.23%, smaller than the maximum FSCSX drawdown of -64.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBFX and FSCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBFXFSCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.23%

-64.66%

+41.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-34.24%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-34.24%

+27.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.21%

-37.06%

+13.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.23%

-37.06%

+13.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-15.04%

+13.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-13.23%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

16.29%

-15.21%

Volatility

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) is 1.08%, while Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that FCBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBFXFSCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

7.81%

-6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.27%

25.98%

-22.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19%

28.97%

-24.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

26.71%

-20.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.96%

24.68%

-18.72%

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBFX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FSCSX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBFX vs. FSCSX - Dividend Comparison

FCBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than FSCSX's 22.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBFX
Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund
4.30%4.11%3.95%3.74%2.53%2.82%3.19%3.28%3.65%3.16%3.55%3.01%
FSCSX
Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio
22.29%15.40%19.17%7.72%9.06%6.54%5.10%12.70%6.20%7.15%3.98%5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBFX and FSCSX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSCSX has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to FCBFX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBFX dropped -23.23% vs FSCSX's -64.66%.

FCBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBFX and FSCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer