PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBD vs. RFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBD vs. RFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBD achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than RFIX's 7.97% return.


FTBD

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.99%
6M
0.67%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
5.08%
5Y*
10Y*

RFIX

1D
0.99%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
7.97%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-14.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBD vs. RFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FTBD
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
0.99%8.35%-2.12%
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
7.97%-28.43%-12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBD and RFIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.64

The correlation between FTBD and RFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBD vs. RFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBD
FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RFIX
RFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBD vs. RFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBDRFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.94

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

-0.58

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

-1.01

+8.50

FTBD vs. RFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the RFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBD and RFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBDRFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

-0.50

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

-0.76

+1.51

Drawdowns

FTBD vs. RFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBD drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, smaller than the maximum RFIX drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBD and RFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBDRFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-38.79%

+31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-25.48%

+22.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-32.25%

+31.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-24.11%

+22.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

14.70%

-13.83%

Volatility

FTBD vs. RFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) is 1.47%, while Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that FTBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBDRFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

5.47%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

20.35%

-17.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32%

29.75%

-25.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

30.90%

-25.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

30.90%

-25.03%

FTBD vs. RFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBD vs. RFIX - Dividend Comparison

FTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than RFIX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FTBD
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF
5.03%5.04%4.76%4.69%
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
4.63%5.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBD and RFIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to FTBD (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBD dropped -6.98% vs RFIX's -38.79%.

On 1-year performance, FTBD leads with 6.48% vs -14.76% for RFIX. On fees, RFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FTBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FTBD has performed better with a 6.48% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FTBD.

FTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 4.63% for RFIX.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FTBD and 0.50% for RFIX.

FTBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBD and RFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer