FTBD vs. DUKZ

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

FTBD (Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FTBD returned 3.96% vs 4.82% for DUKZ. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTBD charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.

Performance

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBD achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than DUKZ's 1.41% return.

FTBD

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -1.22%
• 6M: 0.01%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

DUKZ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 1Y: 4.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	$219.98K	$486.15K	$600.80K
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	$232.55K	$230.39K	$183.28K

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	0.53%	8.35%	0.85%
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	1.41%	4.24%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBD and DUKZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024	0.74

The correlation between FTBD and DUKZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTBD vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTBD

FTBD Risk / Return Rank: 38
FTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
FTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DUKZ

DUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 42
DUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
DUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTBD	DUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.05	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	1.47	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.43	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.16	4.84	-0.68

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the DUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBD and DUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBD drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, which is greater than DUKZ's maximum drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBD and DUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTBD	DUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.98%	-4.70%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-3.39%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-1.73%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.55%	-1.12%	-0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.00%	-0.05%

Volatility

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF (FTBD) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ) at 0.97%. This indicates that FTBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTBD	DUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	0.97%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.44%	4.07%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.28%	4.63%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.81%	4.38%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.81%	4.38%	+1.43%

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTBD vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison

FTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than DUKZ's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF	3.91%	4.05%	2.44%	0.00%
FTBD Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF	5.07%	5.04%	4.76%	4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTBD and DUKZ in my portfolio?

FTBD and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTBD or DUKZ?

FTBD has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to DUKZ (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBD dropped -6.98% vs DUKZ's -4.70%.

Which ETF is better, FTBD or DUKZ?

On 1-year performance, DUKZ leads with 4.82% vs 3.96% for FTBD. On fees, FTBD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, DUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTBD or DUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, DUKZ has performed better with a 4.82% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTBD or DUKZ?

FTBD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTBD or DUKZ?

FTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.07%, compared with 3.91% for DUKZ.

What is the main difference between FTBD and DUKZ?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FTBD and 1.03% for DUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.