PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAL.L vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.17%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


FTAL.L

1D
0.49%
1M
0.76%
6M
4.78%
YTD
8.11%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
8.17%

SCHD

1D
2.61%
1M
2.01%
6M
14.87%
YTD
22.40%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
8.11%23.19%9.03%7.92%0.55%17.18%-9.96%19.28%-9.70%12.98%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
22.40%-3.09%13.61%-0.68%8.25%31.10%11.65%22.45%0.04%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAL.L and SCHD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.41

The correlation between FTAL.L and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAL.L
SCHD

Financial Services

24.7%
9.1%

Industrials

14.8%
7.4%

Healthcare

12.6%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

12.0%
18.5%

Energy

10.1%
14.6%

Basic Materials

8.9%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
6.7%

Utilities

4.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.9%
6.0%

Technology

1.8%
19.4%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Financial Services

FTAL.L
24.7%
SCHD
9.1%

Industrials

FTAL.L
14.8%
SCHD
7.4%

Healthcare

FTAL.L
12.6%
SCHD
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

FTAL.L
12.0%
SCHD
18.5%

Energy

FTAL.L
10.1%
SCHD
14.6%

Basic Materials

FTAL.L
8.9%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAL.L
5.9%
SCHD
6.7%

Utilities

FTAL.L
4.6%
SCHD
0.0%

Communication Services

FTAL.L
2.9%
SCHD
6.0%

Technology

FTAL.L
1.8%
SCHD
19.4%

Real Estate

FTAL.L
1.8%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAL.L vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAL.L
FTAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTAL.LSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

6.16

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

16.47

-9.21

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAL.L and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAL.LSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.26%

-24.95%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-4.34%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-18.85%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-18.85%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

-24.95%

-10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

0.00%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-3.72%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.62%

+1.21%

Volatility

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) is 2.91%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that FTAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAL.LSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

4.32%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

8.77%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

11.48%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

13.97%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

17.01%

-2.50%

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.17%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAL.L and SCHD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAL.L.

FTAL.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAL.L and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer