FTAL.L vs. SCHD
FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTAL.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L returned 8.17%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTAL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 8.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAL.L has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 8.17%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
FTAL.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
SCHD
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 14.87%
- YTD
- 22.40%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 8.11% | 23.19% | 9.03% | 7.92% | 0.55% | 17.18% | -9.96% | 19.28% | -9.70% | 12.98% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 22.40% | -3.09% | 13.61% | -0.68% | 8.25% | 31.10% | 11.65% | 22.45% | 0.04% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAL.L and SCHD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012 | 0.41 |
The correlation between FTAL.L and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTAL.L
SCHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FTAL.L
SCHD
Industrials
FTAL.L
SCHD
Healthcare
FTAL.L
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FTAL.L
SCHD
Energy
FTAL.L
SCHD
Basic Materials
FTAL.L
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FTAL.L
SCHD
Utilities
FTAL.L
SCHD
Communication Services
FTAL.L
SCHD
Technology
FTAL.L
SCHD
Real Estate
FTAL.L
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAL.L vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FTAL.L
SCHD
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTAL.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 6.16 | -3.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 16.47 | -9.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAL.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.26% | -24.95% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -4.34% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -18.85% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -18.85% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -24.95% | -10.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | 0.00% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -3.72% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 1.62% | +1.21% |
Volatility
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) is 2.91%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that FTAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAL.L | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 4.32% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 8.77% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 11.48% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 13.97% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 17.01% | -2.50% |
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTAL.L vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.17% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAL.L and SCHD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAL.L.
FTAL.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAL.L and 0.06% for SCHD.
Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer