PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTAL.L is traded in GBP, while PRUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRUK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAL.L achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.


FTAL.L

1D
0.30%
1M
2.15%
YTD
5.93%
6M
8.27%
1Y
20.36%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
8.54%

PRUK.L

1D
1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.88%
6M
5.16%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
5.93%23.19%9.03%7.92%0.55%17.18%10.03%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.88%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAL.L and PRUK.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.72

The correlation between FTAL.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAL.L
PRUK.L

Financial Services

24.2%
19.9%

Industrials

14.5%
22.2%

Healthcare

12.8%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

12.1%
6.4%

Energy

10.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

8.4%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
13.2%

Utilities

5.1%
3.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.8%

Real Estate

1.7%
8.0%

Technology

1.7%
7.0%

Financial Services

FTAL.L
24.2%
PRUK.L
19.9%

Industrials

FTAL.L
14.5%
PRUK.L
22.2%

Healthcare

FTAL.L
12.8%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

FTAL.L
12.1%
PRUK.L
6.4%

Energy

FTAL.L
10.9%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

FTAL.L
8.4%
PRUK.L
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAL.L
5.6%
PRUK.L
13.2%

Utilities

FTAL.L
5.1%
PRUK.L
3.4%

Communication Services

FTAL.L
3.0%
PRUK.L
6.8%

Real Estate

FTAL.L
1.7%
PRUK.L
8.0%

Technology

FTAL.L
1.7%
PRUK.L
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAL.L
FTAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAL.LPRUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

0.76

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

2.52

+5.14

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAL.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAL.LPRUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

0.70

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.05

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.38

+0.19

Drawdowns

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAL.L drawdown since its inception was -35.26%, roughly equal to the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAL.L and PRUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAL.LPRUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.26%

-36.10%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-13.05%

+4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-18.00%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.17%

-36.10%

+22.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-3.76%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-14.80%

+10.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.93%

-1.28%

Volatility

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) is 4.08%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FTAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAL.LPRUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

4.82%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

11.72%

-2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

14.14%

-3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

16.54%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.45%

-2.70%

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FTAL.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAL.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAL.L.

FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAL.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAL.L and PRUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer