FTAG vs. RSSY
FTAG (First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FTAG is passively managed, while RSSY is actively managed. Over the past year, FTAG returned 14.00% vs 47.81% for RSSY. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTAG charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
FTAG vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 10.75% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.
FTAG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
RSSY
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 32.45%
- 6M
- 27.13%
- 1Y
- 47.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTAG vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 10.75% | 14.82% | -3.92% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 32.45% | -3.52% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAG and RSSY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAG vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
FTAG
RSSY
FTAG vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAG | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.65 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 6.53 | -5.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.75 | 22.39 | -18.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAG | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 3.63 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.33 | 0.75 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
FTAG vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than RSSY's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAG | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.89% | -29.57% | -61.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -7.36% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.58% | -0.16% | -78.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -7.37% | -63.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.14% | +1.60% |
Volatility
FTAG vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAG | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.47% | 2.30% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 9.92% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 13.28% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 18.35% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 18.35% | +1.31% |
FTAG vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTAG vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than RSSY's 1.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAG First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | 1.37% | 1.39% | 2.89% | 3.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.72% | 2.33% | 2.16% | 1.26% | 0.61% | 1.35% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.54% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAG and RSSY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTAG has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs RSSY's -29.57%.
On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 14.00% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 14.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 1.37% for FTAG.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTAG and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer