PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAG vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTAG vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAG achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAG has underperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 5.51%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively higher 7.61% annualized return.


FTAG

1D
1.22%
1M
-0.09%
6M
2.33%
YTD
12.70%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
3.54%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
5.51%
ALL TIME*
-8.03%

NFTY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.96%
6M
-4.29%
YTD
-4.44%
1Y
-0.67%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
7.61%
ALL TIME*
6.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$83.65K$66.15K$180.76K
$2.57M$1.71M$1.60M

FTAG vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
12.70%14.82%-6.72%-7.28%-4.52%17.31%13.88%9.05%-19.46%24.88%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
-4.44%5.47%5.18%24.00%-3.46%26.83%10.04%0.58%-1.51%21.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAG and NFTY is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.31

The correlation between FTAG and NFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTAG vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTAG
NFTY

Basic Materials

52.5%
11.9%

Industrials

25.4%
8.1%

Healthcare

10.0%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
16.2%

Communication Services

-

2.0%

Energy

-

7.9%

Financial Services

-

22.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

9.7%

Utilities

-

4.0%

Basic Materials

FTAG
52.5%
NFTY
11.9%

Industrials

FTAG
25.4%
NFTY
8.1%

Healthcare

FTAG
10.0%
NFTY
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

FTAG
7.6%
NFTY
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FTAG
4.5%
NFTY
16.2%

Communication Services

FTAG

-

NFTY
2.0%

Energy

FTAG

-

NFTY
7.9%

Financial Services

FTAG

-

NFTY
22.0%

Real Estate

FTAG

-

NFTY

-

Technology

FTAG

-

NFTY
9.7%

Utilities

FTAG

-

NFTY
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAG vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTAG
FTAG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FTAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTAG vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTAGNFTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.04

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.13

-0.10

+3.23

FTAG vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAG and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTAG vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAG drawdown since its inception was -90.89%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAG and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAGNFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.89%

-47.67%

-43.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-16.14%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-21.55%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-21.55%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.79%

-47.67%

-3.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.20%

-12.64%

-65.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.30%

-9.65%

-61.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

7.01%

-2.67%

Volatility

FTAG vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF (FTAG) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 3.58%. This indicates that FTAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAGNFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.58%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

12.19%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

14.86%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

17.42%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

20.65%

-1.20%

FTAG vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTAG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTAG vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

FTAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than NFTY's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAG
First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF
1.29%1.39%2.89%3.68%1.77%1.58%1.72%2.33%2.16%1.26%0.61%1.35%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.85%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTAG and NFTY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to NFTY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAG dropped -90.89% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 10-year performance, NFTY leads with 7.61% vs 5.51% for FTAG. On fees, FTAG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NFTY has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTAG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

NFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.29% for FTAG.

FTAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NFTY is India Equities. FTAG tracks Indxx Global Agriculture Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTAG and 0.80% for NFTY.

FTAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAG and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer