FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L
FTAD.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and SWRD.L (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTAD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while SWRD.L is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTAD.L returned 10.20%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for SWRD.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SWRD.L.
Performance
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTAD.L is traded in GBP, while SWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAD.L achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's 10.22% return.
FTAD.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 27.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAD.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 5.88% | 23.18% | 8.98% | 8.00% | 0.33% | 17.32% | -10.00% | 12.80% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.32% | 12.46% | 21.34% | 18.20% | -8.04% | 23.27% | 12.48% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAD.L and SWRD.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2019 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FTAD.L and SWRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Industrials
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Healthcare
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Defensive
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Energy
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Basic Materials
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Consumer Cyclical
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Utilities
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Communication Services
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Real Estate
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Technology
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTAD.L
SWRD.L
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 4.18 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 15.83 | -8.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.33 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.92 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than SWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -26.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAD.L and SWRD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -26.90% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -6.47% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -18.71% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -18.71% | +5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -0.28% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -3.22% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 1.71% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) at 3.50%. This indicates that FTAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAD.L | SWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.50% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 8.82% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 11.59% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 14.37% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 16.41% | -0.85% |
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTAD.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
FTAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while SWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAD.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 2.69% | 2.95% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 3.41% | 3.26% | 3.03% | 5.41% | 3.65% |
SWRD.L SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAD.L and SWRD.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAD.L.
FTAD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SWRD.L is Large Cap Growth Equities. FTAD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAD.L and 0.12% for SWRD.L.
Find the right allocation for FTAD.L and SWRD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer