FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L
FTAD.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) and PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Europe Equities funds - FTAD.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTAD.L returned 10.20%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PRUK.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTAD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRUK.L.
Performance
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTAD.L is traded in GBP, while PRUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRUK.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTAD.L achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.88% return.
FTAD.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAD.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 5.88% | 23.18% | 8.98% | 8.00% | 0.33% | 17.32% | 10.03% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTAD.L and PRUK.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FTAD.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Industrials
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Healthcare
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Defensive
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Energy
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Basic Materials
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Utilities
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Communication Services
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Real Estate
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Technology
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
FTAD.L
PRUK.L
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTAD.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 0.76 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 2.52 | +5.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTAD.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.70 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.05 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.38 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTAD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, roughly equal to the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -36.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAD.L and PRUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTAD.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -36.10% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -13.05% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -18.00% | +4.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.17% | -36.10% | +22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.78% | -3.76% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -14.80% | +10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 3.93% | -1.30% |
Volatility
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAD.L) is 3.86%, while Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FTAD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTAD.L | PRUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 4.82% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 11.72% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 14.14% | -3.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 16.54% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 17.45% | -1.89% |
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTAD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FTAD.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison
FTAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than PRUK.L's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTAD.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 2.69% | 2.95% | 3.74% | 3.34% | 3.41% | 3.26% | 3.03% | 5.41% | 3.65% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTAD.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FTAD.L.
FTAD.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FTAD.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.
Find the right allocation for FTAD.L and PRUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer