FTA vs. PRXV
FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FTA is passively managed, while PRXV is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
FTA vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTA
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 25.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.64%
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTA vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.11% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTA and PRXV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTA vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank
FTA
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTA vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTA | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTA vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTA | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.45% | -1.41% | -61.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.29% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -0.41% | -8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | — | — |
Volatility
FTA vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTA | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.74% | 10.64% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 10.64% | +5.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 10.64% | +9.27% |
FTA vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTA vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.66% | 1.89% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.54% | 2.03% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 1.53% | 1.56% | 2.05% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTA and PRXV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.
FTA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for FTA and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer