FTA vs. ELCV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FTA (First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FTA is passively managed, while ELCV is actively managed. Over the past year, FTA returned 31.73% vs 24.40% for ELCV. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ELCV.

Performance

FTA vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTA achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 19.23% return.

FTA

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.70%
• 6M: 12.86%
• YTD: 18.18%
• 1Y: 31.73%
• 3Y*: 15.29%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: 11.60%
• ALL TIME*: 8.58%

ELCV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: 12.57%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	$1.69M	$1.41M	$1.59M
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	$3.06M	$3.30M	$2.95M

FTA vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	18.18%	14.94%	-2.82%
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	19.23%	9.96%	-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FTA and ELCV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.64

The correlation between FTA and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FTA vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTA

FTA Risk / Return Rank: 94
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ELCV

ELCV Risk / Return Rank: 83
ELCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ELCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ELCV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ELCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ELCV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTA vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTA	ELCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	1.88	+0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	2.59	+1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.33	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.93	3.66	+2.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.26	13.88	+6.38

FTA vs. ELCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the ELCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTA and ELCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTA vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTA drawdown since its inception was -62.45%, which is greater than ELCV's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTA and ELCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTA	ELCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.45%	-18.38%	-44.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.13%	-6.54%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-4.83%	+3.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.97%	-3.59%	-5.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	1.72%	-0.22%

Volatility

FTA vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) have volatilities of 3.93% and 3.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTA	ELCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.96%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	9.91%	-1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.61%	12.78%	-1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	15.47%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.85%	15.47%	+4.38%

FTA vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTA vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison

FTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than ELCV's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF	2.15%	2.34%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTA First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund	1.61%	1.89%	2.02%	2.10%	2.15%	1.54%	2.03%	1.88%	2.28%	1.53%	1.56%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTA and ELCV in my portfolio?

FTA and ELCV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTA or ELCV?

ELCV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FTA (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTA dropped -62.45% vs ELCV's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, FTA or ELCV?

On 1-year performance, FTA leads with 31.73% vs 24.40% for ELCV. On fees, ELCV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTA or ELCV?

Over the 1-year period, FTA has performed better with a 31.73% return vs 24.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTA or ELCV?

ELCV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTA or ELCV?

ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.

What is the main difference between FTA and ELCV?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTA and 0.49% for ELCV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.