FSYD vs. LDRH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FSYD is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, FSYD returned 10.19% vs 6.43% for LDRH. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.

Performance

FSYD vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSYD achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than LDRH's 1.79% return.

FSYD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LDRH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 2.28%
• 1Y: 6.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSYD vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.35%	9.09%	-0.44%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	1.79%	7.18%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FSYD and LDRH is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024	0.83

The correlation between FSYD and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FSYD vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSYD	LDRH
Healthcare	94.6%	-
Energy	34.4%	100.0%
Technology	5.4%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FSYD vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

LDRH

LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 85
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSYD vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSYD	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.48	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	3.99	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.49	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	5.24	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	21.81	-6.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSYD vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSYD and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSYD	LDRH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.69	-0.92

Drawdowns

FSYD vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSYD drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSYD and LDRH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSYD	LDRH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.11%	-3.17%	-8.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.67%	-1.23%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.20%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-0.24%	-2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.67%	0.30%	+0.37%

Volatility

FSYD vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that FSYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSYD	LDRH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	0.69%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.13%	1.97%	+1.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.12%	2.61%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.85%	3.52%	+4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.85%	3.52%	+4.33%

FSYD vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSYD vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

FSYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than LDRH's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF	7.00%	6.41%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSYD and LDRH in my portfolio?

FSYD and LDRH have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSYD or LDRH?

FSYD has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSYD dropped -12.11% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

Which ETF is better, FSYD or LDRH?

On 1-year performance, FSYD leads with 10.19% vs 6.43% for LDRH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSYD or LDRH?

Over the 1-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 10.19% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSYD or LDRH?

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSYD or LDRH?

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 6.32% for FSYD.

What is the main difference between FSYD and LDRH?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSYD and 0.35% for LDRH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.