PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSYD vs. FETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSYD vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSYD achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.


FSYD

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.75%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.97%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
9.54%
5Y*
10Y*

FETH

1D
-5.78%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.45%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
-31.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSYD vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
3.35%9.09%3.48%
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
-39.45%-11.37%-3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FSYD and FETH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSYD vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSYD
FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FETH
FETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSYD vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSYDFETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.97

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

-0.51

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

-0.84

+16.18

FSYD vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSYD and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSYDFETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

-0.47

+2.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

-0.41

+1.19

Drawdowns

FSYD vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSYD drawdown since its inception was -12.11%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSYD and FETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSYDFETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.11%

-64.00%

+51.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-62.95%

+60.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-62.95%

+62.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-32.73%

+30.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

37.82%

-37.15%

Volatility

FSYD vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) is 1.12%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FSYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSYDFETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

9.99%

-8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

46.01%

-42.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12%

68.50%

-64.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

72.27%

-64.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.85%

72.27%

-64.42%

FSYD vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSYD vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FSYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FETH
Fidelity Ethereum Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
6.32%6.49%6.47%6.70%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSYD and FETH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FSYD (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSYD dropped -12.11% vs FETH's -64.00%.

On 1-year performance, FSYD leads with 10.19% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 10.19% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

FSYD has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

FSYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FSYD and 0.00% for FETH.

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSYD and FETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer