FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L
FSWD.L (iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - FSWD.L tracks the iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while IWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSWD.L returned 11.62%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for IWDA.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSWD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FSWD.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSWD.L achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FSWD.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 11.62%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.
FSWD.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.01%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.57%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSWD.L iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.69% | 17.16% | 18.87% | 9.04% | -5.40% | 22.11% | 6.89% | 17.63% | -7.35% | 15.20% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.72% | 12.41% | 21.19% | 18.05% | -8.38% | 23.34% | 12.65% | 22.29% | -3.62% | 12.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSWD.L and IWDA.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2015 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FSWD.L and IWDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FSWD.L
IWDA.L
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSWD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.32 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 3.24 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.41 | 11.85 | +5.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSWD.L drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -26.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSWD.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSWD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.43% | -26.18% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.90% | -6.37% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -18.91% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -18.91% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.27% | -26.18% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -1.46% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -3.50% | -3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 1.74% | -0.20% |
Volatility
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FSWD.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSWD.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 2.90% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 9.48% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 11.98% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 14.57% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 15.42% | +1.98% |
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSWD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSWD.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FSWD.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSWD.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FSWD.L.
FSWD.L tracks iShares STOXX World Equity Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FSWD.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for FSWD.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer