FSWCX vs. GQHPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX).

FSWCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 19, 2017. GQHPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	1.49%	22.50%	19.90%	12.64%	-3.50%	7.57%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	11.80%	7.53%	12.69%	3.94%	6.73%	10.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSWCX achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 11.80% return.

FSWCX

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -3.05%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 7.30%
• 1Y: 21.55%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: —

GQHPX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSWCX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.

GQHPX

GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund

FSWCX

Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund

Return for Risk

FSWCX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSWCX

FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

GQHPX

GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSWCX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	0.93	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.28	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.18	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	1.37	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	4.50	+2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSWCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSWCX and GQHPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSWCX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	0.93	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.90	-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between FSWCX and GQHPX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

FSWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than GQHPX's 2.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSWCX Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund	7.29%	7.40%	8.86%	9.68%	12.90%	5.71%	2.55%	2.37%	3.84%	0.07%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	2.66%	2.98%	3.14%	2.64%	3.24%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSWCX drawdown since its inception was -41.41%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSWCX and GQHPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSWCX	GQHPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.41%	-17.26%	-24.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.65%	-8.17%	-5.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.01%	-2.15%	-1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-3.36%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	2.64%	+0.34%

Volatility

FSWCX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 2.66%. This indicates that FSWCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSWCX	GQHPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	2.66%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	6.98%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.55%	11.90%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.75%	12.67%	+4.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.95%	12.67%	+8.28%