PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSUTX vs. FSCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSUTX achieves a 4.36% return, which is significantly lower than FSCHX's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FSUTX has outperformed FSCHX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while FSCHX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.


FSUTX

1D
2.12%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
4.36%
6M
2.10%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
11.46%

FSCHX

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
16.34%
6M
17.09%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
2.91%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
4.36%16.19%28.76%-1.12%5.20%17.64%0.75%22.68%8.41%17.94%
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
16.34%-8.85%-6.17%12.80%-13.81%31.95%17.52%8.30%-22.30%31.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FSUTX and FSCHX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1985

0.50

The correlation between FSUTX and FSCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSUTX vs. FSCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSUTX
FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCHX
FSCHX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FSCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) and Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSUTXFSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

0.82

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.46

2.00

+1.46

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSUTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FSCHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSUTX and FSCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSUTXFSCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.70

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.03

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.27

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.56

+0.11

Drawdowns

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSUTX drawdown since its inception was -66.73%, which is greater than FSCHX's maximum drawdown of -59.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSUTX and FSCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSUTXFSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.73%

-59.24%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-13.98%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.20%

-27.38%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-27.38%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.61%

-51.75%

+14.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-8.48%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-8.88%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

5.73%

-1.80%

Volatility

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) at 4.98%. This indicates that FSUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSUTXFSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.98%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

11.84%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

16.36%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

19.94%

-2.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

22.46%

-3.07%

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSUTX and FSCHX have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

FSUTX vs. FSCHX - Dividend Comparison

FSUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than FSCHX's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
2.94%2.23%8.27%6.33%11.44%1.18%1.10%6.97%15.01%8.05%4.75%6.58%
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
5.03%6.61%6.50%3.52%4.67%2.68%4.86%2.29%8.37%5.61%2.51%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSUTX and FSCHX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSUTX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to FSCHX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSUTX dropped -66.73% vs FSCHX's -59.24%.

FSUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSUTX and FSCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer