PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCHX vs. FSRPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCHX achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSRPX's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCHX has underperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 6.71%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.


FSCHX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.94%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.30%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
6.71%

FSRPX

1D
-1.78%
1M
-2.73%
YTD
1.89%
6M
-9.70%
1Y
-2.09%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
20.42%-8.85%-6.17%12.80%-13.81%31.95%17.52%8.30%-22.30%31.63%
FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio
1.89%-4.15%23.28%26.94%-29.44%18.25%44.27%26.33%4.58%25.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCHX and FSRPX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 1985

0.63

The correlation between FSCHX and FSRPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCHX vs. FSRPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCHX
FSCHX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRPX
FSRPX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FSRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCHXFSRPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.01

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

-0.07

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

-0.16

+3.14

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the FSRPX Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCHX and FSRPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCHX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, which is greater than FSRPX's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCHX and FSRPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCHXFSRPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.24%

-55.75%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-17.79%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-22.58%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.38%

-39.01%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

-39.01%

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-11.49%

+6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-9.09%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

7.84%

-2.11%

Volatility

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) is 4.91%, while Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that FSCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCHXFSRPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

5.44%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

16.97%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

19.64%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

22.77%

-2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

21.66%

+0.84%

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCHX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCHX vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison

FSCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than FSRPX's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
2.84%2.23%8.27%6.33%11.44%1.18%1.10%6.97%15.01%8.05%4.75%6.58%
FSRPX
Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio
6.73%8.75%12.41%7.40%2.90%15.92%6.82%2.13%2.17%3.37%0.14%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCHX and FSRPX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSRPX has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to FSCHX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCHX dropped -59.24% vs FSRPX's -55.75%.

FSCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCHX and FSRPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer