PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTZX vs. TRBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTZX achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than TRBFX's 1.76% return.


FSTZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*

TRBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
2.09%5.99%4.87%4.67%-2.83%1.32%
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
1.76%6.34%4.60%3.01%-5.19%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTZX and TRBFX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.79

The correlation between FSTZX and TRBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTZX vs. TRBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTZX
FSTZX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FSTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TRBFX
TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTZXTRBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.38

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.68

1.32

+5.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.52

2.66

+21.86

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the TRBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTZX and TRBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTZXTRBFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

0.91

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

0.72

+0.48

Drawdowns

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTZX drawdown since its inception was -5.30%, smaller than the maximum TRBFX drawdown of -7.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTZX and TRBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTZXTRBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-7.33%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.70%

-3.48%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-3.51%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.36%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-1.42%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

1.70%

-1.51%

Volatility

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FSTZX) is 0.51%, while T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that FSTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTZXTRBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

0.61%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

4.76%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64%

5.06%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

5.15%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

4.01%

-1.22%

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTZX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TRBFX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTZX vs. TRBFX - Dividend Comparison

FSTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than TRBFX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FSTZX
Fidelity Series 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund
3.64%4.02%2.78%2.54%5.25%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
4.79%4.95%4.48%3.64%6.11%4.99%1.38%3.27%2.34%1.61%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTZX and TRBFX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBFX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to FSTZX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTZX dropped -5.30% vs TRBFX's -7.33%.

FSTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTZX and TRBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer