PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTSX vs. QISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTSX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than QISIX's 20.85% return.


FSTSX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
6.76%
6M
7.42%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
14.80%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.97%

QISIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.24%
YTD
20.85%
6M
21.03%
1Y
27.78%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
4.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
6.76%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%19.74%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
20.85%18.14%-5.09%16.38%-19.17%3.48%13.72%18.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTSX and QISIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2019

0.69

The correlation between FSTSX and QISIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTSX vs. QISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

QISIX
QISIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTSXQISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

2.52

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.75

8.42

-3.67

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the QISIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTSX and QISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTSX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum QISIX drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTSX and QISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTSXQISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-41.11%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-10.48%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-15.47%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.91%

-37.79%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.31%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-12.02%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.13%

+0.22%

Volatility

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) is 4.68%, while Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund (QISIX) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that FSTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTSXQISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

5.02%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

11.60%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

13.67%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

14.99%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

16.05%

-0.11%

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than QISIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTSX vs. QISIX - Dividend Comparison

FSTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than QISIX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.27%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%
QISIX
Pear Tree Polaris International Opportunities Fund
1.56%1.89%3.29%1.27%1.66%2.52%0.68%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTSX and QISIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISIX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to FSTSX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTSX dropped -38.91% vs QISIX's -41.11%.

QISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTSX and QISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer