PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTSX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSTSX having a 7.71% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 7.76%. Over the past 10 years, FSTSX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FSTSX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.71%
6M
10.35%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
9.90%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.71%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTSX and FCNTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2009

0.67

The correlation between FSTSX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTSX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTSXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.13

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.37

9.04

-3.67

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTSX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTSXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.72

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.79

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.89

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.78

-0.15

Drawdowns

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTSX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTSX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTSXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-49.19%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-11.30%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-19.75%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.91%

-32.59%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-32.59%

-6.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-0.53%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-8.16%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.65%

+0.65%

Volatility

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FSTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTSXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.26%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

10.48%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

14.03%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

19.15%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

19.68%

-3.74%

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTSX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FSTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.15%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTSX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTSX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTSX dropped -38.91% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTSX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer