PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTSX vs. CSGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTSX achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than CSGIX's 35.70% return.


FSTSX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.77%
YTD
7.71%
6M
10.35%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
9.90%

CSGIX

1D
-0.97%
1M
7.21%
YTD
35.70%
6M
38.48%
1Y
36.65%
3Y*
24.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.71%27.49%4.97%18.36%-12.12%
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
35.70%15.11%10.21%13.62%-20.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTSX and CSGIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2022

0.80

The correlation between FSTSX and CSGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTSX vs. CSGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CSGIX
CSGIX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CSGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CSGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTSXCSGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

2.64

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.37

7.04

-1.66

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the CSGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTSX and CSGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTSXCSGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.64

-0.02

Drawdowns

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTSX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than CSGIX's maximum drawdown of -26.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTSX and CSGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTSXCSGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-26.50%

-12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-13.68%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-20.13%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-2.05%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-10.25%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

5.12%

-1.82%

Volatility

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) is 4.43%, while Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund (CSGIX) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that FSTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTSXCSGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

7.90%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

16.77%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

19.55%

-5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.42%

17.66%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

17.66%

-1.72%

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CSGIX's 2.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTSX vs. CSGIX - Dividend Comparison

FSTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than CSGIX's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSGIX
Calamos International Small Cap Growth Fund
0.90%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.15%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTSX and CSGIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSGIX has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to FSTSX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTSX dropped -38.91% vs CSGIX's -26.50%.

CSGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTSX and CSGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer