PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTSX vs. BISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTSX achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than BISMX's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTSX has underperformed BISMX with an annualized return of 10.26%, while BISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.


FSTSX

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.52%
6M
3.36%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
12.10%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.26%

BISMX

1D
0.92%
1M
1.30%
6M
-1.24%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
18.25%
10Y*
11.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
6.60%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
2.04%45.81%23.44%39.27%-8.48%18.58%4.85%7.16%-20.04%11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTSX and BISMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.79

The correlation between FSTSX and BISMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTSX vs. BISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

BISMX
BISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTSXBISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.81

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

1.92

+1.70

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the BISMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTSX and BISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTSX drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, smaller than the maximum BISMX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTSX and BISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTSXBISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.91%

-47.07%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-11.61%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-11.61%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.91%

-31.26%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

-47.07%

+8.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-6.38%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-7.94%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.90%

-1.47%

Volatility

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTSXBISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

3.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.89%

10.68%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

12.71%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

13.91%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

14.08%

+1.60%

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BISMX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTSX vs. BISMX - Dividend Comparison

FSTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than BISMX's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
3.73%3.34%3.22%2.93%4.16%3.45%0.92%0.82%4.10%8.51%4.16%3.65%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.29%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTSX and BISMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BISMX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to FSTSX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTSX dropped -38.91% vs BISMX's -47.07%.

FSTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTSX and BISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer