FSTR vs. REFI
FSTR (L.B. Foster Company) and REFI (Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.) are both stocks. FSTR operates in Railroads (Industrials), while REFI operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 3 years, FSTR returned 47.81%/yr vs 3.40%/yr for REFI. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSTR vs. REFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTR achieves a 62.97% return, which is significantly higher than REFI's -6.85% return.
FSTR
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 15.25%
- YTD
- 62.97%
- 6M
- 56.08%
- 1Y
- 114.04%
- 3Y*
- 47.81%
- 5Y*
- 19.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
REFI
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -7.65%
- 1Y
- -11.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSTR vs. REFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 62.97% | 0.19% | 22.33% | 127.17% | -29.60% | -8.94% |
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | -6.85% | -8.70% | 8.69% | 23.70% | 3.35% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTR and REFI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.20 |
Over the past year, FSTR and REFI have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FSTR:
$464.85M
REFI:
$235.46M
FSTR:
$1.04
REFI:
$226.63
FSTR:
42.40
REFI:
0.05
FSTR:
0.07
REFI:
0.00
FSTR:
0.84
REFI:
5.31
FSTR:
2.68
REFI:
0.00
FSTR:
$563.36M
REFI:
$44.35M
FSTR:
$119.30M
REFI:
$42.41M
FSTR:
$37.88M
REFI:
$8.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTR vs. REFI — Risk / Return Rank
FSTR
REFI
FSTR vs. REFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSTR | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 0.94 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.46 | -0.74 | +8.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.01 | -1.33 | +21.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSTR vs. REFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTR drawdown since its inception was -84.47%, which is greater than REFI's maximum drawdown of -26.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTR and REFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTR | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.47% | -26.55% | -57.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -15.25% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.90% | -19.76% | -26.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.03% | -19.25% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.79% | -9.95% | -31.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 8.39% | -2.67% |
Volatility
FSTR vs. REFI - Volatility Comparison
L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) have volatilities of 8.20% and 8.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTR | REFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.20% | 8.00% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.96% | 16.88% | +13.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.73% | 24.27% | +17.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 24.41% | +17.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.26% | 24.41% | +23.85% |
Dividends
FSTR vs. REFI - Dividend Comparison
FSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTR L.B. Foster Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 1.17% |
REFI Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. | 17.15% | 15.33% | 13.36% | 13.41% | 13.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSTR vs. REFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between L.B. Foster Company and Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTR and REFI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTR has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to REFI (8.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTR dropped -84.47% vs REFI's -26.55%.
FSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTR and REFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer