PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTFX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTFX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than FNILX's 9.63% return.


FSTFX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.25%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
1.64%

FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSTFX
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
0.85%5.36%2.36%3.85%-4.90%0.15%3.23%4.19%1.26%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTFX and FNILX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.05

The correlation between FSTFX and FNILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTFX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTFX
FSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSTFXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

1.38

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.94

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

12.99

-5.26

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is higher than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTFX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTFX drawdown since its inception was -9.50%, smaller than the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTFX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTFXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-33.76%

+24.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-9.01%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.00%

-19.08%

+17.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.65%

-25.40%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.73%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-5.35%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

2.03%

-1.55%

Volatility

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund (FSTFX) is 0.36%, while Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FSTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTFXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

4.82%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

9.90%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

12.61%

-11.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.93%

17.34%

-15.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.05%

20.04%

-17.99%

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSTFX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than FNILX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTFX
Fidelity Limited Term Municipal Income Fund
2.43%2.99%2.03%1.70%0.92%1.08%1.58%1.92%1.65%1.56%1.60%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTFX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSTFX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTFX dropped -9.50% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FSTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTFX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer